D-1 General Employment Policies
1.1 Academic Freedom
(UH Board of Regents 21.03)
To establish
and clarify the rights and responsibilities of the faculty
pursuant to academic freedom, the board adopts the following
policy:
21.03.1
The faculty member is entitled to full freedom in research and
in the publication of the results, subject to the adequate
performance of the faculty member’s other academic duties; but
research for pecuniary return should be based upon an
understanding with the authorities of the component university.
21.03.2
The faculty member is entitled to freedom in the classroom in
discussing the subject matter, but the faculty member should be
careful not to introduce into the teaching controversial matter
which has no close relation to the subject.
21.03.3
The faculty member is a citizen, a member of a learned
profession, and an officer of an educational institution. When
speaking or writing as a citizen, the faculty member shall be
free from institutional censorship or discipline, but the
faculty member’s special position in the community imposes
special obligations. As a person of learning and an educational
officer, the faculty member should remember that the public may
judge the profession and the institution by the faculty member’s
utterances. Hence the faculty member should at all times strive
for accuracy, exercise appropriate restraint, show respect for
the opinions of others, and make every effort to indicate that
the faculty member is not speaking for the institution.
(11/18/04)
University of
Houston-Victoria Policy on Freedom of Speech
The University
of Houston at Victoria (“UHV”) strongly supports the freedoms
that are guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States
Constitution, including the freedom of speech. UHV recognizes
that the freedom of speech is essential to its mission of
teaching and research, and as an honest evaluation of
performance and effective decision making. Please be aware that
postings on the WebCT website that are defamatory or otherwise
unlawful could subject a faculty member to personal civil and/or
criminal liability. Each individual UHV faculty member is
responsible for the content of his or her own postings on the
WebCT website, and must personally exercise appropriate
discretion and proper judgment to ensure that such postings do
not subject his or herself to liability.
Please also be
aware that recorded communications, whether in print or in
electronic form, may be subject to public disclosure under the
Texas Public Information Act, and may also be subject to
disclosure by a court order, subpoena, or as otherwise required
by law.
Disclaimer on
WebCT site:
Please be
advised that each faculty member who posts comments or other
information on this website does so on his or her own behalf,
and does not post comments or other information on behalf of the
University of Houston at Victoria (“UHV”). Please be further
advised that the views and opinions that are expressed on this
website do not necessarily represent the views, opinions, or
policies of UHV.
As provided by
Legal Services, August 2006.
1.2 Affirmative Action
It is the policy of the University
of Houston-Victoria that all applicants shall be treated equally in all respects
regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability
or veteran status. This policy applies, but is not limited, to the
following personnel actions: recruitment, appointment, employment,
training, reclassification, promotion, retention, discipline, termination,
tenure, demotion, total compensation, education, or other assistance and
benefit programs, or any other aspect of the terms, conditions and/or privileges
of employment.. For a more complete policy statement, refer to the
Affirmative Action Plan and Policy C-5, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative
Action.
The Director, Human Resources
and Affirmative Action acts as the university's hearing officer for all informal
affirmative action complaints or inquiries. If an amicable solution
does not result from such informal review, persons may request an additional
hearing under mutually agreeable conditions. For more information
on Title IX and other discrimination complaints and grievance procedures,
refer to Policy C-22 in the Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual.
Updated: Summer
2004
1.3 Employment of Aliens
Federal law prohibits the employment
of all aliens who are not registered as "resident aliens" with the Immigration
and Naturalization Service of the Department of Justice. Exceptions to this
rule are made for the employment of any person paid from instructional accounts
(Teaching Salaries Only, Departmental Operating Expense, Instructional Administration,
and Organized Activities) and for students employed as student assistants
or in other minor positions for a period not to exceed 90 days.
Alien employees at state institutions,
and their families, are entitled to "resident student" status in any state
institution, if employed as graduate assistants.
1.4 Nepotism
Relatives of members of the Board
of Regents or the Chancellor shall not be employed by the university unless
the employment took place at least one year prior to the appointment of the
Board member or the Chancellor. Relatives of other university officers
shall not be employed by the university in positions where the officer has
the official authority to hire or recommend or approve the hiring, salary
or promotions of the relative. Relatives shall not be employed in
a supervisory-subordinate relationship even if it results from marriage
after the employment relationship was formed. The provisions of this
policy apply to all System programs regardless of funding source.
For a detailed policy statement, refer to Policy C-6, Nepotism.
Updated: Summer
2004
1.5 Legal
Protection for Faculty
In your capacity as a faculty
member and UHV employee, you may be named as a defendant in a
lawsuit or otherwise involved in legal proceedings. To
encourage state employees and officers to perform their duties
without fear of liability, the State has enacted certain laws to
safeguard state employees and officers from lawsuits brought
against them in their official capacities. However, these
laws do not prevent the filing of lawsuits.
When UHV faculty members are
sued because of acts taken in the course and scope of
employment, the State provides legal representation. Any
faculty member served with a summons and lawsuit should
immediately contact the Office of General Counsel. The
Office of General Counsel will in turn request representation
for that faculty member through
the Texas Attorney General's Office. Faculty members can
choose to hire their own attorneys at their own cost.
While acting in the
course and scope of employment, UHV employees generally are
covered by the Official Indemnity Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code
§
104.001 et seq., which grants a limited indemnification
to state employees and officers for acts of alleged negligence
or deprivation of rights. Any judgment up to the statutory
limits ($100,000 per person or $300,000 per occurrence) entered
against a faculty member in his or her individual capacity for
acts or omissions in the course and scope of employment will be
paid by the State, unless a specific finding of bad faith or
gross negligence is entered.
Provided by the UH
System legal office June 2006
D-2 UHV Search Committee and
Hiring Procedures
2.1 Search Committee Procedures
The Dean proposes new or replacement
faculty positions to the Provost, following consultation with the school’s
faculty. The Dean completes a Position Request Form, indicating field,
rank, salary range, and effective date.
If the position is approved by the Provost on the advice of the Academic
Council,
1. The Dean appoints a search committee, including at least three members,
one of whom is to hold an appointment in a school other than that in which
the search is located.
2.
A draft description of the position is given to the chair of the search committee.
3. The chair
of the search committee meets with the Director, Human Resources/Affirmative
Action (Dir HR/AA) to review search guidelines. Guidelines include
provision of stated criteria for evaluating applicants and
common interview questions to be asked of all candidates.
See J-14 Guidelines for Interviewing.
The search committee will provide the ranking and screening procedures to the
Director of HR prior to screening applications. Interview questions
will be provided to the Director of HR prior to the interview process.
4. With the advice of the search committee, the Dean writes an advertisement
for the position. The Provost and the Dir HR/AA approve the ad. The
Dir HR/AA then places the ad in the publications agreed upon by the Provost
and Dean, and will forward a copy of the ad to the chair of the search committee.
5. On receipt of applications the Human Resources office dates the applications
(keeps envelopes) and forwards the Voluntary Affirmative Action Information
Survey to candidates. The HR office also sends a letter acknowledging
receipt of the application, requesting any materials omitted, and including
any additional information specified by the search committee. Applications,
along with copies of the acknowledgment letters, are forwarded to the school
secretary. The school secretary prepares a file for each applicant
and maintains it for the search committee.
6. Applications
completed by closing date or commencement of screening are evaluated and
ranked by committee members. Written evaluations of all candidates
are kept and filed with the Affirmative Action office on appropriate forms
after completion of the search process.
7. The committee determines a short list of potential candidates to be interviewed.
8. References are checked prior to setting up interviews.
9. The committee recommends names of 2-5 candidates for
potential interviews to the Dean.
10. The School Dean
communicates to the Provost the candidates proposed for campus
interviews. Candidates to be interviewed may be narrowed to an
initial 3 or fewer. Depending on the strength of the pool,
that number may be expanded.
11. The Dean invites candidates and sets dates for visits.
12. The Dean with the help of the school secretary plans the visit.
13. After all visits, the committee recommends a ranking of candidates to the
Dean. The Dean recommends to the Provost.
14. The School Dean is then authorized to extend an offer by telephone.
15. The School Dean notifies the Provost office in writing if a candidate accepts
an offer in order for an appointment letter to be prepared. The Dean
should refer to Checklist for Offers of Faculty Employment.
16. The Human Resources office sends letters notifying other candidates that
the position has been filled.
17. All Affirmative Action forms are completed by the search committee chair
and approved by the Dir HR/AA.
Updated:
Fall 2004
Form:
Request to Fill Vacant Faculty Position
2.2 Hiring Procedures
Initial Process:
1. Complete hiring
request form consulting with faculty and Provost as need be.
2. Request may
go before Academic Council or Deans for review (all positions are considered
open till approved).
3. Dean prepares
initial job description and shares with search committee and Provost for
any further input.
4. Dean submits
advertisement to Human Resources office for placement. Dean handles
any posting to job lists for the field or announcement to Deans or Chairs
at other institutions.
Advertisements:
1. A standard
format with succinct phrasing will be used for each advertisement, which is to
include the basic job requirements for the position. Additional
information about the job, school, institution, or location may be provided
on request, with the acknowledgment, or on the web.
2. Electronic ads will ordinarily
be used for advertising. School should combine ads when possible.
Updated: Fall 2004
Interviews:
1. Campus interviews
ordinarily should be limited to three or fewer, unless the candidates
interviewed should be unacceptable
or turns down the offer.
2. Limit interviews to one night.
Car rentals could be arranged, but
candidates should pay for gas.
3. Limit paid employee meals with candidates to no more than one
meal with the committee or some members of it and one with the Dean.
4. Candidates should claim reimbursement for other meals at per diem rates
but should not claim reimbursements for meals provided.
General:
1. Searches should commence as early as possible, once a vacancy is known.
2. Recruitment should be at the beginning assistant professor level unless
a program should lack an experienced faculty member capable of providing
leadership to the program.
3. Salary range should ordinarily be set at 90-100% of the CUPA average
for new assistant professors.
4. If the position must be filled with a candidate who lacks terminal qualifications,
the Dean and Provost should agree on the appropriate rank, salary, and conditions.
5. The Dean should confer with the Provost before extending an offer.
6. Once the offer has been accepted the Dean should notify the Provost's
office in writing so that a letter of appointment can be prepared for the
Provost's signature.
2.3 Faculty Critical-Need
Provisions
In cases of critically needed positions that an academic school has been
unable to fill in keeping with the usual hiring policy, the following provisions
will apply, effective for fall 2002, for an indefinite period:
Full-Time Positions:
Deans may request that the position be advertised at the associate or assistant/associate
level, the assumption being that this provision may expand the pool of available
prospects. It may also be necessary to exceed the established salary
ranges in the case of high-demand fields and critically needed positions.
.
Half-Time/Quarter-Time Positions:
Deans may request authority to extend the offer of a quarter-time or half-time
position that would be paid at up to 0.1 per course assignment of the normal
nine-month hire-in rate for a full-time position in the particular field.
Additional expectations in terms of qualifications and professional involvement
will apply to such appointments. Although such offers should be discussed
in advance with the provost, they may be extended by the dean. Funding
for such positions should be tracked separately from the usual part-time
adjunct hiring, especially if the need results from allocated but unfilled
full-time positions.
Part-Time Positions:
Deans have had for several years discretion to exceed the standard salary
scale for part-time faculty, up to the stated limit, when travel or location
is at issue. Part-time faculty are counted at a .2 FTE per regular
course per semester or summer term and are paid in accordance with an established
scale, which is reviewed and adjusted periodically, usually during budget
preparation for the next biennium.
Overloads:
Overloads are not routinely assigned and, when necessary, are paid at the
standard part-time rate per course.
D-3 University of Houston System Academic Personnel Policies
(UH 06.A.09, 1994)
3.1 Definitions and Conditions of Employment
1. Appointment is defined as the employment of
an individual in a given capacity for a specified time period at a stated
salary. Faculty appointments are made at the respective universities
following procedures developed at the university and which have been approved
by the Chancellor. All faculty appointments are subject to the final
approval of the Chancellor and Board of Regents upon recommendation of the
President. Prior approval of the Chancellor is required before any faculty
appointment with tenure can be made. In addition, no person shall be
appointed to the position of Dean, or equivalent, or Vice President, or equivalent,
without prior consultation with the Chancellor. No administrator may
be given faculty status or tenure without a review and positive recommendation
from the academic unit involved.
2. Separation is defined as the process by which
an individual terminates employment with the university. Three distinct
modes of separation are recognized:
a. Resignation is voluntary termination of employment
by an employee. Presidents may accept resignations and shall so inform the
Chancellor who shall inform the Board of Regents.
b. Non-reappointment refers to a situation in which
a non-tenured faculty member is not offered the next successive employment
appointment at the end of a stated employment period. The President
is delegated this authority. The Chancellor shall be notified of such
decisions and shall inform the Board of Regents. Non-reappointment
notification must conform to the following schedule of dates:
1. Not later than March 1 of the first academic
year of service if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or if
a one-year appointment terminates during an academic year, at least three
months in advance of termination.
2. Not later than December 15 of the second academic
year of service if the appointment expires at the end of that academic year;
or, if an initial two-year appointment terminates during an academic year,
at least six months in advance of its termination.
3. Not later than May 31 of the academic year preceding
the academic year in which the appointment is to expire, when the individual
is in the third or later year of appointment.
c. Dismissal is severance from employment due to
either adequate cause, financial exigency, medical reasons, or the discontinuance
of academic programs. Dismissal shall:
Not be used to restrain faculty members in their exercise of academic freedom.
When dismissal involves a tenured faculty member, consultation with the
Chancellor and University Legal Counsel shall be made prior to any official
action. Subject to final approval by the Board of Regents, the Chancellor
has the authority to dismiss faculty upon recommendation of the President
after full and appropriate due process. (See Board of Regents Policy 11.07.)
3.2 Faculty Dismissal
Each campus of the University of Houston System, through faculty governance
processes of the particular campus, shall develop policies and procedures
pertaining to dismissal of faculty members. Such policies must be
consistent with those specified herein, and must be approved by the Chancellor
of the University of Houston System. Dismissal recommendations are initiated
by the President of the component campus. The final decision concerning the
dismissal of a faculty member is made by the Chancellor of the University
of Houston System upon concurrence by the Board of Regents.
Campus policies and procedures for faculty dismissal must assure the following:
1. The rights of the individual to due process
are protected.
2. Dismissal shall not infringe the constitutionally
protected rights of an individual, and shall not be used to restrain faculty
members in their exercise of academic freedom.
3. Dismissal procedures provide for timely written
notice of impending dismissal, which specifies the grounds under which dismissal
is sought.
4. A faculty member notified of impending dismissal
has available the option of a hearing before an impartial faculty tribunal
designated by the governance of the particular campus.
5. The burden of proof in dismissal proceedings
rests with the institution.
Dismissal is the termination of employment
of a tenured faculty member, or of a probationary or special faculty member
prior to the end of the term of appointment. Dismissal may be justified by
one or more of the following reasons:
Adequate Cause:
a) Grounds related to demonstrated professional incompetence,
or to dishonesty in teaching or research.
b) Grounds related to substantial and manifest neglect
of professional or academic responsibilities.
c) Grounds related to actions that would result in a
general condemnation of the faculty member by the American academic community.
Financial Exigency:
Termination of employment justified by demonstrated and bona fide imminent
financial crisis which threatens the continuation of the academic programs
in their present form, and which cannot be alleviated by other means.
Each campus will develop procedural standards to determine whether a state
of financial exigency exists. Standards so developed will include
provisions for faculty involvement in the determination and for a minimum
twelve-month notice of termination of appointment to tenured faculty. Untenured
faculty will be given notice consistent with campus non-reappointment guidelines.
Medical Reasons:
Termination justified by clear and convincing medical evidence that the
faculty member cannot fulfill professional and academic obligations, or the
terms and conditions of appointment.
Discontinuance of Academic Programs:
Termination of employment based on educational and academic consideration
reflecting long-range judgments concerning the educational mission of the
campus or university. Tenured faculty will be given notice 18 months
prior to termination of employment due to discontinuance of academic programs.
Untenured faculty will be given notice consistent with campus non-reappointment
guidelines. In the event of actions involving the dismissal of faculty
by reason of financial exigency or discontinuance of academic programs,
the campus administration will make every reasonable effort to place affected
faculty in other positions. The appointment of a faculty member with
tenure will not be terminated in favor of retaining a faculty member without
tenure except in extraordinary circumstances where a distortion of the academic
program would otherwise result.
D-4 University of Houston-Victoria Appointment and Termination
Procedures
4.1 Appointments
1. When a vacant or new position is approved by
the President, it is the responsibility of the School Dean, in cooperation
with the school’s faculty and Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs,
to determine the position's requirements, prepare advertisements, screen
candidates, conduct interviews, and recommend to the President the best possible
candidate within budgetary constraints.
2. After completion of regular UHV recruitment
procedures, appointments are made by the Board of Regents, University of
Houston System, upon recommendation of the President.
3. The terms and conditions of every faculty appointment
will be stated or confirmed in writing, and a copy of the appointment document
will be supplied to the faculty member. Unless stated otherwise in the initial
letter of appointment, the faculty member will be eligible for tenure consideration
in due course on the strength of credentials presented at hiring.
"Consideration" does not imply award of tenure or promotion. Any subsequent
extensions or modifications of an appointment and any special understanding,
or any notices incumbent upon either party to provide, will be stated in
writing with a copy provided to the faculty member.
4. With the exception of special appointments or
reappointments clearly limited to special conditions or specified time periods,
all full-time appointments to the rank of instructor or higher are of two
kinds: probationary appointments or appointments with tenure.
4.2 Reappointment and Termination
Procedures
1. The status of all faculty is reviewed on a yearly
basis by the School Dean in conference with each individual faculty member.
The appointment of non-tenured faculty who are, however, tenure-track is
renewable from academic year to academic year. The School Dean informs
the faculty member of any decision not to renew in accordance with the established
notification dates (March 1 for the 1st year, December 15 for the 2nd year,
and May 31 of the preceding year thereafter). The decision to reappoint
a non-tenured faculty member is made at the discretion of the Provost
upon recommendation of the appropriate School Dean. In
the case of non-renewal, the faculty member may elect to file a protest with
the Faculty Grievance Committee.
2. Tenured faculty may expect to be reappointed
each academic year, except when the following conditions exist: adequate cause,
financial exigency, medical reasons, discontinuance of a program of instruction,
or resignation/retirement.
a. Adequate cause is interpreted as (1) demonstrated
incompetence; (2) demonstrated dishonesty in teaching or research; (3) substantial
and manifest neglect of duty; (4) conduct involving moral turpitude or otherwise
grossly in violation of the ethics of the national university community.
Dismissal or the threat of dismissal shall not be used, however, to restrain
faculty in the legitimate exercise of their academic freedom or civil rights.
b. Where there is a bona fide financial exigency--as
when the state legislature fails to appropriate funds to support the
current faculty--a tenured faculty member may be dismissed. In such cases,
however, a responsible effort will first be made by the university to reappoint
the faculty member to another position for which the faculty member is qualified
and there is adequate funding.
c. When a program of instruction is discontinued,
the faculty appointments involved in that program may be terminated.
As noted in UH System policies in D-3.2, tenured faculty in such instances
must be given 18 months prior notice. However, the university's responsibilities
to the faculty in such cases are the same as in cases involving financial
exigency, and a serious attempt to retain the faculty members in other capacities
for which they are qualified shall be undertaken.
d. A tenured faculty member may resign or retire
effective at the end of an academic year, provided that notice is given
in writing at the earliest possible opportunity. Voluntary modification
contract is another option available to tenured faculty with the concurrence
of the institution.
4.3 Terminal Notice of Salary
If an appointment is terminated, the faculty member shall receive salary
until the day of termination. On the recommendation of the President
to the Chancellor, the length of service may be considered in determining
the date of termination. Notice of the date of termination shall normally
be given in accordance with the schedules stated in the System Academic
Personnel Policies. The provision for terminal notice of salary need
not apply in the event that there has been a finding that the conduct, which
justified dismissal, involved moral turpitude or conduct grossly in violation
of the ethics of the university community.
4.4 Dismissal Procedures
Dismissal
applies
to the
termination
of tenured
faculty
members or
to untenured
ones during
the term of
their
appointment.
It does not
apply to
non-reappointment
( or
non-renewal)
of an
untenured
member.
When the conduct of a faculty member so warrants, he/she may be dismissed
under the provisions for "adequate cause." In such cases, the Provost
shall present the faculty member with a written statement of the charges
supporting the decision for dismissal. Upon receiving this statement,
the faculty member may (1) accept the decision upon the grounds indicated;
(2) discuss the matter informally with the Provost and present his/her side
of the case with a view toward arriving at a mutually satisfactory settlement;
or (3) file a written denial of the charges for review, and/or appeal for
a formal hearing before the Grievance Committee. If the faculty member
takes no action within 30 days of receiving the notification of dismissal
from the Provost, he/she forfeits the right of appeal and the dismissal shall
be effected as stipulated in the notification. But if the faculty member
decides to appeal the case, he/she must either present a written statement
denying the charges to the Grievance Committee (see number 2 below) or formally
request a hearing within 30 days after receiving the notification.
In the case of a formal hearing by the Grievance Committee, notice of the
hearing with the specific charges in writing shall be served by the Provost
at least 20 days prior to the commencement of the hearing. Specific
details concerning the hearing procedures are enumerated below:
1. Grievance Committee members deeming themselves
disqualified for bias or interest shall remove themselves from the case,
either at the request of a party or on their own initiative. Each party
shall have a maximum of one challenge without stated cause.
2. At his/her own discretion, the faculty member
may waive the formal hearing or may respond to the charges in writing at
any time before the hearing. If the faculty member waives a hearing,
but denies the charges or asserts that the charges do not support a finding
of adequate cause, the Grievance Committee shall evaluate all available evidence
and rest its recommendation upon the grievance in the record.
3. The Grievance Committee may, with the consent
of the parties concerned, hold joint pre-hearing meetings with the parties
in order to simplify the issues, effect stipulations of facts, provide for
the exchange of documentary or other information, and achieve such other
appropriate pre-hearing objectives as will make the hearing fair, effective,
and expeditious.
4. The hearing shall be public or private, in accordance
with the faculty member's wishes. If the faculty member declines to express
a preference, the President, in consultation with the Grievance Committee,
shall exercise judgment as to whether the hearing should be public or private.
5. The burden of proof that adequate cause exists
rests with the institution and shall be satisfied only by clear and convincing
evidence in the record considered as a whole.
6. During the proceedings, the faculty member shall
be permitted to have an academic advisor and counsel of his/her choice.
At the request of either party, a representative of a responsible educational
association shall be permitted to attend the proceedings as an observer.
7. An accurate record of the hearing or hearings
shall be taken; and a typewritten copy shall be made available to the faculty
member, without cost, at the faculty member's request.
8. The Grievance Committee shall grant adjournments
to enable either party to investigate evidence to which a valid claim of
surprise is made.
9. The faculty member shall be afforded an opportunity
to obtain necessary witnesses and documentary or other evidence. The administration
shall cooperate with the Grievance Committee in securing witnesses and in
making available documentary and other evidence in compliance with legal
constraints.
10. The faculty member and the administration shall
have the right to confront and cross-examine all witnesses. Where
the witnesses cannot or will not appear, but the Grievance Committee determines
that the interests of justice require admission for their statements, the
Committee shall identify the witnesses, disclose their statements, and,
if possible, provide for interrogatories.
11. In the hearing of charges on incompetence,
the testimony shall include that of qualified faculty members from this
or other institutions of higher education.
12. The Grievance Committee shall not be bound
by strict rules of legal evidence and may admit any evidence which is of
probative value in determining the issues involved. Every reasonable
effort shall be made to obtain the most reliable evidence.
13. The findings of fact and the decision of the
committee shall be based solely on the hearing record.
14. Except for such simple announcements as may
be required, covering the time of the hearing and similar matters, public
statements and publicity about the proceedings by either the faculty member
or administrative officers shall be avoided so far as possible until the proceedings
have been completed, including consideration by the Board of Regents of the
university.
15. Pending a final decision by the Grievance Committee,
the faculty member may be suspended, or assigned to other duties in lieu
of suspension. (The section on "Terminal Notice of Salary" stipulates
periods of retention.) Before suspending a faculty member and pending
an ultimate determination of status through the institution's hearing procedures,
the administration shall consult with the Grievance Committee concerning
the propriety, length, and other conditions of the suspension. A suspension
that is intended to be final is a dismissal and shall be treated as such.
Except in extreme circumstances, salary may be continued during the period
of suspension. (See the Texas Education Code, Section 51, 231- 51.255.)
Updated:
Summer 2005
4.5 Grievance Committee Decisions
The President and the faculty member shall be notified of the decision
of the Grievance Committee in writing and shall be given a copy of the record
of the hearing.
If the Grievance Committee concludes that adequate cause for dismissal
has not been established by the evidence in the record, it shall so report
to the President.
If the committee concludes that adequate cause has been established, it
shall recommend to the President either dismissal or a lesser academic penalty
if it deems such appropriate. In either case, it shall provide rationale
for its recommendation. After studying the Grievance Committee report,
the President shall make a recommendation to the Chancellor. If the
recommendation differs from that of the Grievance Committee, the President
shall state the reasons for disagreement in writing to the Grievance Committee
and to the faculty member and shall provide an opportunity for response
before transmitting the case to the Chancellor.
If dismissal or other severe sanction is recommended, the President shall,
on request of the faculty member, transmit to the Chancellor the record
of the case. The Chancellor may request further review or take statements
from principals involved.
Either the decision of the Grievance Committee shall be sustained by the
Chancellor or the proceeding shall be returned to the President with specific
objections for reconsideration by the Grievance Committee. The Grievance
Committee shall then reconsider, taking into account the stated objections
and receiving new evidence if
necessary. The President shall forward the results of the reconsideration,
along with his or her own recommendation, to the Chancellor who, after study
of the reconsideration, shall make a final recommendation to the Board of
Regents. The Board may request additional evidence at its discretion.
D-5 Grievance Procedures (1998)
5.1 General
The following procedures for redress of grievance are available to all
faculty members. The types of grievances covered under this general category
include (but are not limited to) matters of salary, hours, teaching assignments,
allotment of resources, and facilities. Grievance procedures pertaining to
dismissal of faculty members, whether tenured or untenured
during the
term of the
appointment,
are covered in D-4.4 of the Faculty Manual.
The Informal (Pre-Writing) Stage:
The grievance will, as a rule, first be presented by the grievant to the
appropriate supervisor (usually the School Dean) for deliberation.
It is hoped that most grievances will be resolved at this level.
The Formal Stage:
1. If informal deliberation does not resolve the
matter, the grievant may petition the supervisor for redress by filing the
grievance in writing. The grievant may present the grievance personally,
may entrust a representative to act in his or her behalf, or may be accompanied
by a representative or counsel.
2. Within 10 working days of receipt of the written
grievance, the supervisor must respond to it in writing, with a copy of
the response to be sent to the supervisor's immediate superior (usually
the Provost). If the supervisor fails to respond within this time
limit, the grievant may send the grievance to the Grievance Committee of
the Faculty Council within 10 working days after the deadline for the supervisor's
response.
3. If the grievant is not satisfied with the response
of the supervisor, within 10 days of receipt of that response he or she
may submit the grievance to the Grievance Committee of the Faculty Council.
A grievant who fails to submit the grievance to the Grievance Committee
within this time limit loses the right to appeal the decision of his or
her supervisor.
4. In reviewing a formal complaint, the Grievance
Committee shall first decide whether the evidence submitted in support of
the complaint warrants a detailed investigation or a formal hearing.
a. If the committee decides that the complaint
does not merit its consideration, the rationale for this decision shall
be stated in writing and presented to the grievant, the supervisor, and
the superior of the supervisor within 10 working days of receipt of the
grievance.
b. If the committee decides that the formal complaint
has merit and contains sufficient information for the committee to
reach a decision on the matter, it shall review the matter and send its written
findings to the grievant, the supervisor, and the superior of the supervisor
within 10 working days of receipt of the grievance.
c. If the committee decides to conduct an investigation
or hold a formal hearing in which both sides are invited to present their
sides of the matter, it shall notify the grievant, the supervisor, and the
superior of the supervisor of the decision to do so within 10 working days
of receipt of the grievance. The investigation or hearing shall begin
within 10 working days of the decision to conduct it and shall proceed as
expeditiously as possible. The findings shall be sent in a written
report to the grievant, the supervisor, and the superior of the supervisor
within five working days of the end of the investigation or hearings.
5. If either
the grievant or the supervisor believes the Grievance Committee findings to
be unacceptable, he or she may provide the immediate superior of the supervisor
with a written rebuttal within 10 working days of receipt of the Grievance
Committee decision. Copies of the rebuttal shall be sent to the committee
and to the other party in the grievance. Within 10 working days of
receipt of this rebuttal, the decision of the immediate superior of the supervisor
shall be transmitted in writing to the grievant, the superior, and the Grievance
Committee. This decision will be final.
Additional Considerations:
1. If the grievance warrants it and both parties
agree, at any point in the process the institution may appoint or employ
a third party to mediate.
2. The timelines listed for the stages above may
be extended by the party required to respond by means of a written statement
to the other party claiming more time, providing reasons, and setting a
reasonable deadline.
Updated:
Summer 2005
5.2 Grievances Pertaining to
Non-Reappointment
of Untenured Faculty
Untenured faculty whose appointments have
not
been
renewed
may request
the review of the Grievance Committee. Such requests must be made subsequent
to the faculty member's receiving
written
notification
that
the
appointment
will
not
be
renewed;
further,
the
appeal
must
be
made
within
30
days
after
the
receipt
of
notification
from
the
Provost.
The faculty member shall set forth, in writing, the nature of the grievance
and factual evidence pertinent to the case for the Grievance Committee's
deliberation. The appeal shall include a statement of the faculty member's
agreement to the presentation before the Grievance Committee of such reasons
and evidence as the university may wish to bring forth in support of its
decision. When the Grievance Committee has reviewed the case and arrived
at a decision, it shall transmit the notification in writing to the faculty
member, the School Dean, and the Provost.
Please note restrictions specified in the charter of the Faculty Grievance
Committee.
(See
section
C.
Faculty
Council.
Also,
see
Section
E-2.5.
Review
and
Renewal
of
Non-Tenured
Faculty.)
Updated:
Summer
2005
5.3 Grievances Pertaining to Termination of Tenured Faculty
The termination of faculty with tenure may occur only in special circumstances--resignation
or retirement, medical reasons, financial exigencies, discontinuance of
a program in which the faculty member serves, or dismissal for adequate
cause (see Section D-3.2
and
D-4.4
above).
In
all
cases,
the
faculty
member
shall
be
informed
in
writing
of
the
rationale
for
the
decision
to
terminate
his/her
appointment,
and
shall
be
permitted
to
appeal
the
decision
before
the
Grievance
Committee.
When the decision for termination is based upon a bona fide financial exigency
or the discontinuance of a program, the University will provide the faculty
member, in writing, with the rationale and other evidence in support of
the decision. The faculty member may request, within 30 days, that
the case be reconsidered by the Grievance Committee, with the faculty member
maintaining the right to present evidence in support of his or her appeal.
After hearing both sides of the case, the committee will make a recommendation
to the Provost, with copies forwarded to the faculty member and the School
Dean.
When, in the faculty member's judgment, adequate consideration of the evidence
was not given in the decision for termination, he/she may file an appeal
for re-consideration of the case to the Grievance Committee within 30 days
of the notification for
of
termination. The term "adequate consideration"
encompasses essentially procedural rather than substantive issues.
After reviewing the case with a view toward rectifying the alleged procedural
irregularities, the Grievance Committee shall make its recommendation, in
writing, to the Provost, with copies forwarded to the faculty member and
the School Dean. When, in the faculty member's judgment, considerations
that violate academic freedom or civil rights have significantly influenced
a decision for termination, he/she may file an appeal, within 30 days of
the notification of
termination, for a hearing before the Grievance Committee.
In such cases, the faculty member is responsible for stating the grounds
upon which the allegations are based; the burden of proof shall rest upon
him or her. Participants in the decision for termination shall be permitted
to present the evidence in support of the decision and otherwise to answer
the allegations brought by the aggrieved faculty member. When both
sides of the case have received an adequate hearing, the Grievance Committee
shall make a recommendation in writing to the Provost as to the disposition
of the case, with copies forwarded to all the parties concerned and the School
Dean.
Updated:
Summer
2005
D-6 Resignation/Retirement Protocol
1. Faculty members should address letters of resignation
or retirement to the School Dean or the Provost with a copy to the other.
2. Cabinet-level administrators should address
such letters to the President with a copy to their immediate supervisor,
as applicable.
3. All others should address letters to their immediate
supervisor.
4. Faculty and staff should let their Dean or supervisor
know of their intention as far in advance as possible, so that plans can
be made for their replacement.
5. The recipient of the original letter should
forward it to the Human Resources office, retaining a copy if desired.
6. The Human Resources office will notify the Office
of University Advancement of separations.
D-7 Emeritus Status
7.1 University of Houston System Guidelines
The following establishes general System guidelines for the development
of individual campus policies and procedures for determining emeritus eligibility,
privileges, and responsibilities.
1. The titles "emeritus" and "emeriti" will be
conferred only upon those retired tenured professors who have made a significant
contribution to the university through a long and distinguished record of
scholarship, teaching, and/or service.
2. In addition to the title Professor Emeritus,
the university will recognize the title President Emeritus, Chancellor Emeritus,
and Provost Emeritus, as recommended by the Board of Regents.
3. While each campus will formulate its own nomination
procedures, all nominations should originate at the departmental or school
level and should be based upon the recommendation of colleagues in the department,
school, or college.
4. All emeritus appointments are subject to approval
by the Board of Regents upon recommendation by the President. Approval
by the Regents will normally occur in the spring of each year.
5. In addition to library and parking privileges,
emeritus faculty should receive invitations to and announcements of appropriate
campus and university functions and should be listed in appropriate catalogs
and directories. Each campus will determine any additional courtesies
or privileges accorded emeritus faculty.
6. Emeritus faculty are expected to remain willing
to assist and advise the university or campus as requested, particularly
in their areas of competence.
7.2 University of Houston-Victoria
Policy
Definition of Emeritus Status:
"Professor Emeritus" is to be considered a title of distinction conferred
by colleagues upon one who has served this institution and the profession
well for a number of years.
Provisions for Awarding Emeritus Status:
1. To be eligible, a retired faculty member must
ordinarily meet these criteria:
a. Have completed a minimum of 10 years of full-time
service at the institution, at least five with regular teaching duties of
two or more classes each year.
b. Have achieved the rank of associate or full
professor.
Qualification: Eligibility criteria may be waived upon recommendation
of the school, a two-thirds majority vote of the faculty, and concurrence
of the President.
2. To be selected,
the member must meet these criteria:
a. Have first received the recommendation of the
school--based upon a simple majority vote with the concurrence of the School
Dean or upon a two-thirds majority vote.
b. Have then received the recommendation of the
Faculty Council--based on a simple majority vote and the concurrence of the
President of the institution.
c. Have finally received the approval of the Board
of Regents.
Privileges of Emeritus Status:
1. Professors Emeriti may use the title in professional
correspondence and activities.
2. They may attend faculty meetings and, if selected,
serve as voting members on committees.
3. They may attend university functions, use university
facilities, enjoy parking privileges, and participate in university activities
(e.g., marching with the faculty at graduation).
4. They will be listed under "Emeriti" in the university
catalog.
Expectations of Professors Emeriti:
Professors Emeriti have no obligations but are expected to continue to
conduct themselves as professional teachers and scholars and to represent
or otherwise assist the institution from time to time.
Note: Librarians may also be accorded emeritus status in keeping
with the same criteria outlined above but as recommended by their library
colleagues and Director.
Also, administrators of long and distinguished service may be recommended
for emeritus status by action of the President of the institution.
D-8 Voluntary Modification of Employment
8.1 University of Houston System Policy
Each campus of the University of Houston System may develop policies and
procedures governing voluntary modification of employment for faculty.
Such policies must be consistent with those specified herein and must be
approved by the Chancellor of the University of Houston System.
Applications by individual faculty to participate in this program are reviewed
by the campus academic administration and must be approved by the appropriate
President.
Eligibility:
Full-time faculty who have reached age 55 and have been enrolled in the
Texas Teacher Retirement System for at least 10 years or in an approved Optional
Retirement Program for at least 10 years may be considered for participation
in the Voluntary Modification of Employment Program.
Qualifications:
The following qualifications of employment must apply for those faculty
approved for participation in the Voluntary Modification of Employment Program.
1. Status as a full-time faculty member is relinquished,
including tenure rights.
2. Teaching and other work assignments may be negotiated
on an individual basis, but may not exceed that corresponding to 50% full-time
employment for the academic year. Such negotiated agreement must be
in writing and signed by the faculty member and the President.
3. Compensation to the faculty member during the
period of Voluntary Modification of Employment shall reflect the negotiated
full-time equivalent status.
4. The eligibility of a participant to receive
retirement benefits will be governed by state laws and regulations pertaining
to such eligibility, and, in the case of individuals enrolled in the Optional
Retirement Program, the terms and conditions specified by contractual agreement
of the individual with the particular provider.
Benefits:
The participant shall be entitled to amenities normally afforded full-time
faculty to include, but not be limited to, office space, library and parking
privileges, and clerical support. In addition, the individual shall
have the option to participate in health and life insurance programs to
the extent provided by the state or by the university for retirees. Information
concerning such insurance benefits is available from the Human Resources
Officer. Participation in the Teacher Retirement or Optional Retirement
programs is not available to the participant.
Duration:
A negotiated agreement for Voluntary Modification of Employment shall be
for a period of time not to exceed five years, and may be renewed annually
by mutual agreement. However, any negotiated agreement for Voluntary Modification
of Employment may not extend beyond the normal retirement age of the participant.
8.2 University of Houston-Victoria Procedures
Modified employment agreements are negotiated on an individual basis, modeled
upon previous agreements on file. Faculty members contemplating Voluntary
Modification of Employment should inquire carefully into the impact on their
benefits, since policy on these may change from time to time. Note
that an individual on modified employment contract is limited to participation
in health and life insurance programs only "to the extent provided... for
retirees." They also lose any accumulated sick leave and do not further
acquire sick leave. In previous instances, the university has, however,
extended the following provision, taken from the guidelines adopted by the
Texas Coordinating Board on October 29, 1982.
The participant and university agree that should the participant become
physically or mentally unable to continue the reduced workload, the university
will continue to pay the participant his or her salary as provided herein
until the end of the academic year in which the participant could not perform
his or her workload. At the end of such academic year, the obligation
of the university under this policy shall terminate.
Faculty members in the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS), as opposed
to an Optional Retirement Program (ORP), should be aware of the special
conditions applicable to their workload arrangements if they intend to draw
retirement benefits while on modified employment.
The Human Resources Office can provide a statement of benefits available
whenever a member is considering Voluntary Modification of Employment.
Modified Employment Office
and Computer Support
Faculty members who have agreed to Voluntary Modification of
Employment and who teach four courses or the assigned equivalent
during the nine-months academic year may choose a shared office
and computer ensemble with another faculty member or home
office support at half the allowance provided to full-time
faculty members who are home officed. The computer
equipment provided in either case is at the discretion of the
academic school, so long as the equipment is within the existing
inventory. (In other words, this provision for office
support applies when the assigned workload is very nearly
half-time. Note that total workload for faculty members on
Modified Employment contracts should not amount to 50 percent of
a full-time workload during the nine months or, if applicable,
during the summer session.)
Faculty members on Modified
Employment Contract who teach fewer than four courses or the
assigned equivalent during the nine-month academic year may use
common office areas set up for part-time and off-site faculty
members and may be assigned limited computer equipment for home
use at the discretion of the academic school. However, no
office is assigned and no stipends are provided for home
officing.
Summer 2006
D-9 Part-Time Faculty Hiring
Part-time faculty members are important and valued contributors to the
university’s instructional effort. The university seeks to provide
them with the guidance and support needed to carry out their teaching duties
effectively. Although each academic school may have additional policies
and procedures, the following ones are common across the university.
1. Deans or their designees are responsible for
ensuring that new adjunct members receive sufficient orientation, including:
a. “General Information” sheets for faculty, which
explain processes, services, and expectations.
b. Sample syllabi for the course being taught and/or
similarly relevant materials.
c. Responses to anticipatable questions on where
to go, who to see, and what to do.
2. As advisable,
the dean may assign an experienced full-time or part-time colleague to serve
as a contact or informal guide on instructional issues and questions that
may arise.
3. Adjunct members have access to the same secretarial,
instructional-support, and library services as full-time faculty members
in carrying out their instructional duties.
4. Shared office space is provided for adjunct
faculty members, including computer and telephone (school secretaries can
provide the combination for entry).
5. Parking is provided; a sticker is needed.
6. E-mail accounts and consideration for faculty-development
funds may be provided with the sponsorship of the dean.
7. Evaluation of instruction includes mandatory
student surveys for each course, as well as review of syllabi and other course
materials. It may include class visits.
8. Adjunct members are reimbursed for approved
expenses related to the performance of their instructional duties, including
travel to secondary sites (travel to the campus or primary workplace is
not included).
Persons with advanced degrees in fields taught at the university are welcome
to share their credentials with the appropriate Dean, should they be interested
in consideration for part-time teaching opportunities that may arise.
D-10 Additional Employment Policies
10.1 Assignment of Faculty Offices
Faculty offices that become available are assigned on the basis of seniority
as a full-time faculty member at UHV, regardless of rank or title.
An office becomes available any time a faculty member is moving out of it
for any reason. Faculty members may not trade offices without reference
to seniority or without clearance through the Provost's office. In practice
this policy applies primarily to the preferred offices--first, those with
windows and second, those that are larger. The seniority list will
be consulted when one of these offices becomes available. The person
with the highest seniority who wants it may request it.
Other offices will be assigned as they become available to new faculty
members or current faculty who wish to move. In either case, faculty members
should inform the Provost's office. The seniority list will apply as need
be. Requests and assignments are handled by the Provost's office in
consultation with School Deans. Faculty offices are not designated by schools.
10.2 Direct Deposit of Pay
Under section 403.016 of the State of Texas Government Code, University
of Houston-Victoria employees' pay must be deposited electronically into their
accounts with financial institutions, unless certain conditions exist to
exempt the employee from this requirement. For additional policy and
procedure information, see Item C 28 in the Administrative Policies and Procedures
Manual.
10.3 Personnel Action Requests (PARs)
Unless specified otherwise in these rules, the following delegations of
authority on the UHV campus govern the approval of recommendations for personnel
actions:
1. The Board of Regents shall approve appointments
and changes in status during employment of all members of the faculty and
professional administrative staff. This approval shall be upon the
recommendation of the President, concurred in and presented by the Chancellor,
University of Houston System.
2. Other personnel actions shall be approved by
the President, who may further delegate in a uniform manner the authority
to approve personnel actions not involving a departure from established policy.
Regardless of the effective date shown on the Personnel Action form, no
personnel action is considered officially approved, nor is there an obligation
to any prospective employee until final approval is obtained.
10.4 Personnel Files
Human Resources:
1. The Human Resources office retains the original
hire-in file with letter of application, resume, letters of reference, letter
of appointment, and official transcripts. These items should be provided
to the Human Resources Officer once the newly hired person has returned
the signed letter of appointment.
2. This file should not need to be consulted unless
some question arises, but the Provost, Deans, and others as approved by
the President will have access.
3. Faculty members will also have access to their
own file, except for any letters of reference to which they have previously
waived access.
4. The Human Resources office receives copies of
succeeding letters concerning reappointment, annual salary, and any alterations
of a contractual nature, including promotion, tenure, and separation.
5. The Human Resources office also maintains records
on leave time, payroll, benefits, etc.
Provost's Office:
1. The Provost’s office retains duplicates of resume
and appointment letters; annual evaluation reports; pay, promotion, and
tenure recommendations; and copies of any formal adjustments to workload,
compensation, or conditions of employment, etc.
2. Faculty members may have access to their own
file--as may Deans and others as approved by the President or the faculty
member.
3. The Provost or Dean may also retain an informal
file reflecting individual accomplishments or other materials provided by
the faculty member, but this is not considered part of the official employment
record.
School Dean:
1. Deans may keep copies of such faculty personnel
materials as may be helpful to their work, but need not duplicate the official
files indicated above.
2. School Deans' personal notes for evaluation
or other purposes should not be shared or passed on to the next Dean unless
the Dean wishes these to be considered part of the official faculty personnel
record--in which case the originals or copies should be given to the Provost
for inclusion in the official file, which is open to the faculty member.
3. School Deans will maintain files on part-time
faculty members.
Public Records:
It should be noted that most of the information in a faculty member's file
is subject to open records provisions, though materials reflecting performance
evaluations ordinarily are not.
Any request for access will be considered a request for a Public Access
and appropriate process will be followed according to University Policy on
Public Access.
10.5 Sexual Harassment