Format
Organize your book review according to your thesis statement
rather than the actual chronological order of the work being
reviewed. This method will lead to a stronger paper that directly
supports your thesis statement. A book review should contain
an introductory paragraph; a body section consisting of several
paragraphs which summarize, give background information on
and conduct an internal analysis of the work; and a concluding
section consisting of one or two paragraphs.
I. Introduction gives complete bibliographical information
on the book, presents the thesis of the book and also states
your own thesis (your opinion or evaluation of the book).
a. Bibliographical information is organized according to your
instructor’s guidelines. Usually you will include the
bibliographical information either within the text of your
paper or in a separate listing. See examples below. Note that
both examples are written in APA style.
Example: Within Text
Philip C. Kolin’s Successful Writing
at Work states that good communication skills are an essential
part of any
career today (Massachusetts: D.C. Health and Co., 1994).
Example: Separate Listing
Kolin, P.C. (1994).
Successful Writing at Work. Massachusetts:
D.C. Health and Co.
In this book, Kolin emphasizes that good communication skills
are an essential part of any career today. . . . . .
and the paragraph continues.
c. The book’s intended audience may be briefly mentioned
in the introduction.
(Test
your understanding of this section with Exercise 1.)
II. Body Paragraphs are subdivided into 2 to 4 sections
that comprise the bulk of the paper. The first section
is a summary section that gives a concise overview of
the work. The second section is a background
section.
This section gives information relating the book to other
works in its field and names the criteria which the evaluation
will be based on. The third section is the internal
analysis section where the good and bad points of the work will
be evaluated. The aesthetic analysis section is usually
optional and includes comments on any graphics or charts
that a work may exhibit. It traditionally follows the
internal analysis section.
a. Summary gives an overview of the book’s main
points and relates it to other books in the field. This
section serves as a brief outline of the book and identifies
the issues that are going to be discussed in the book
review. Only the book’s main points should be discussed.
The reviewer may use paraphrased information and occasional
quotes to help summarize the work.
b. Background Information helps place the book in the
proper perspective by explaining how the book relates
to other works in the same field. This section also explains
the criteria for reviewing the book and may review the
author’s credentials and methodology. Check the
preface, foreword or introduction to obtain this information.
c. Internal Analysis presents the information that will
compose the longest section of the review. The criteria
against which the work is being evaluated are stated
and their importance should be justified. This is the
section that will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses
of the book. In fact, this section is often separated
into two subsections: strengths (if any) and weaknesses (if any). Arguments are supported with evidence from
the work, including paraphrased and summarized statements
with proper citation information.
d. Aesthetic Analysis comments on the style of the book,
mentioning any maps, illustrations, pictures or charts.
In this section, you will describe how graphics work
with the text to enhance or distract from the overall
experience of reading it.
III. Conclusion is usually only one or two paragraphs
in length and restates the main points of the book review,
establishes the book’s value to its audience and
makes recommendations to the reader.
a. Restate main points of the work along with its basic
strengths and weaknesses that were previously emphasized
in the review.
b. Estimate overall value of the book. When doing this,
keep this question in mind: Does the book succeed in
meeting its original thesis?
c. Recommendations concerning the book’s value are made to the reader. Ask yourself if the work makes
a significant contribution to the field and then considerately
state your opinion.
(Test
your understanding of this section with Exercise 2.)
REVIEW
How are you going to organize the strengths and weaknesses
of the work in the body section of your paper?
Continue to Book Review: Checklist
Copyright 2003 by the Academic Center and the
University of Houston-Victoria.
Created 2002 by Candice Chovanec Melzow.