|
Language is
subject to transformations over time, many of which spring
from our own misunderstandings of proper usage. Some
commonly misused phrases are could of, should of,
and would of; these phrases are misspellings of the
contractions could've, should've, and
would've.
One problem
with these verb constructions is that of is a
preposition. As a preposition, of must have an object.
Examples of prepositions (bolded in the following
examples) with objects (in italics) include on
the table, for Jacob, around
the courtyard, and after Saturday.
The
preposition of ends up in these phrases because of
the way we read and pronounce these contractions. Therefore, of sometimes mistakenly
replaces have in the following contractions:
should’ve, could’ve, and would’ve. Read
them out loud, and you’ll notice that the “’ve” does, in
fact, sound almost like “of.”
Should have
(Correct) ►
Should’ve (Correct)
► Should of (Wrong)
Could have
(Correct) ►
Could’ve (Correct)
► Could of (Wrong)
Would have
(Correct) ►
Would’ve (Correct)
► Would of (Wrong)
|